Statement by U Hla Myint, Adviser and Substitute Delegate of Myanmar Delegation to the 96th ILC
at the Committee on Application of Standards
(Special Sitting on Myanmar)
(Geneva, 2 June 2007)
Mr. Chairman,
At the outset, I should like to congratulate you on
your re-election as Chairman of the Committee on Application of Standards.
I am confident that your able stewardship of our deliberations will
lead to an outcome acceptable to all.
Mr. Chairman,
Since our last meeting in this hall, many positive
developments have taken place in Myanmar concerning the issue of forced labour,
thanks to the firm commitment of the Government of the Union of Myanmar to
effectively address this issue and the steadfast cooperation and patience of
the ILO in this endeavour. Our
joint endeavours focussed on a Supplementary Understanding establishing a
complaint mechanism for forced labour victims.
We received the ILO mission in October 2006 and had
detailed discussions on a draft Supplementary Understanding proposed by the
ILO. Although we could not agree
on it before the 297th session of the Governing Body, series of
discussions were continued on a sustained basis between Myanmar and the ILO in
Nay Pyi Taw, Yangon and Geneva, based on the final compromised text of the ILO.
In the discussions, both sides demonstrated positive attitude and
utmost patience in the sole interest of the victims of forced labour.
This led to a successful conclusion of a Supplementary Understanding
between Myanmar and the ILO on 26 February 2007.
To give wide publicity to the Supplementary Understanding, the
Permanent Representative of Myanmar in Geneva issued a press release on the
same day. In addition, the
Director-General of the Department of Labour provided to the foreign
journalists in Myanmar the clarifications concerning Supplementary
Understanding and continued cooperation between Myanmar and the ILO.
On 3 April 2007, the Ministry of Labour launched a website on labour
matters, including the Supplementary Understanding.
Mr. Chairman,
As you are aware, the complaint mechanism established
under the Supplementary Understanding came into force immediately.
Mr. Chairman,
Justice delayed is justice denied and the Government
of Myanmar makes sure that the cases involving forced labour transmitted by
the Liaison Officer to the Working Group headed by the Deputy Minister for
Labour were immediately investigated. The
expedition with which the required investigations were carried out resulted in
the quick resolution of the cases received by the Working Group.
Mr. Chairman,
A majority of Member States have recognized that
Myanmar is effectively implementing the Supplementary Understanding.
As the existence of the complaint mechanism is well known to the
public, as evidenced by receipt by the LIaison Officer a.i. of complaints from
many parts of the country, we are confident that this mechanism will become an
effective tool in our joint effort to eradicate the practice of forced labour.
In addition, the Myanmar authorities have taken prompt legal action
against those who committed forced labour and these actions were published in
the national newspapers, thus enhancing the credibility of the mechanism.
Mr. Chairman,
Within three months since we implemented the Supplementary
Understanding, we have received only nine
cases that involved forced labour.
However, to our regret, there have been various attempts to increase
the number of complaints, taking advantage of a clause
in the Supplementary Understanding prohibiting any action taken against a
complainant(s) or their representative(s) on grounds of the complaint.
We feel that those attempts may undermine the smooth functioning of the
mechanism for the bona fide victims.
Mr. Chairman,
298th
session of the Governing Body underlined the importance of the mechanism
continuing to function effectively and the necessity of adequate staff
resources for the Liaison Officer. We
also recognize that the continued functioning of the mechanism is in the
interest of the victims of forced labour.
In this regard, the Deputy Minister for Labour received the ILO Liaison
Officer a.i. on 8 April 2007 and assured him that full cooperation will be
extended in dealing with future complaints.
There has been no disagreement between the two sides on the necessary
appropriate steps to be taken to enable the Liaison Officer or his/her
successor to effectively discharge the additional work and responsibilities.
The mechanism has been in place only for 3 months.
As clearly stipulated in paragraph 8 of the Supplementary
Understanding, in a reasonable time and after due consultation the necessary
adjustments could be made to the staff capacity of the Liaison Officer, and
the Government of Myanmar will take into consideration the request of the
Governing Body to extend the necessary cooperation and facilities.
Mr. Chairman,
Please allow me to reiterate our position regarding a
matter which we strongly feel is of vital importance for Myanmar as well as
for the image of the International Labour Organization. That is the participation of the members of Free Trade Union
of Burma (FTUB) which the Ministry of Home Affairs of Myanmar has declared as
terrorists by its Notification No.3/2005 and Declaration No.1/2006 issued on
28 August 2005 and 12 April 2006 respectively.
In the light of intensified cooperation between Myanmar and the ILO, as
evidenced by the emergence of a redress mechanism for forced labour victims,
to allow the participation of elements involved in terrorist acts at the
special sitting on Myanmar will in no way contribute to our worthy efforts to
eliminate the practice of forced labour.
Their participation will simply complicate the matter.
Mr. Chairman,
As Mr. Richard Horsey has decided to end his
assignment as ILO Liaison Officer, Myanmar has positively responded to the
appointment of Mr. Stephen Marshall as the Liaison Officer of the ILO in
Yangon. I wish to inform the
Committee that we would extend to Mr. Marshall the facilities and courtesies
that have been extended to Mr. Richard Horsey.
I also like to take this opportunity to recognize the essential role
that Mr. Richard Horsey has played in our efforts to eliminate forced labour
practices.
Mr. Chairman,
The conclusion of the Supplementary Understanding and
the resultant establishment of a complaint mechanism are the most significant
developments in the history of cooperation between Myanmar and the ILO.
This achievement testifies to the genuine spirit of cooperation from
both sides. The similar spirit of
cooperation is essential for the mechanism to continue to function
effectively. We assure that we
will make every effort to enable the mechanism to function effectively.
In this regard, we look forward to receiving the spirit of cooperation
and accommodation from the ILO as well as from its membership.
Thank you.