Myanmar disassociates itself from the adoption of the politically motivated resolution tabled by the European Union (Geneva, 31 March 2026)

31 March 2026 The 61st session of the Human Rights Council took action on the draft resolution entitled “Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar” (A/HRC/61/L.24/Rev.1) tabled by Cyprus on behalf of the European Union on 31 March 2026 in Geneva. Myanmar consistently opposes country-specific resolutions and mandates that are created against the principles of impartiality, […]

Read More…

Myanmar’s Observations on draft resolution (A/HRC/61/L.24.Rev.1) entitled “Situation of human rights in Myanmar” to be submitted by the EU at the 61st Human Rights Council Session

30 March 2026 1.         As a matter of principle, Myanmar always opposes country-specific resolutions and their follow-up mechanisms. The following observations are prepared for the benefit of member states to have a balanced view. Since the resolution has been tabled by the European Union for over thirty years, Myanmar only includes its observations on […]

Read More…

Myanmar’s Response to the Interactive Dialogue with the so-called Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in  Myanmar at the 61st Session of the Human Right Council

13 March 2026 The Second Interactive Dialogue on Myanmar, held on 13 March 2026 at the ongoing 61st session of the Human Rights Council with the so-called Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, failed to reflect Myanmar’s perspective, as country was not represented. Myanmar firmly rejects these politicized, country-specific discussions and […]

Read More…

Observations on the Report of the so-called Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar submitted to the 61st session of the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/61/58)

10 March 2026 General Observations 1. The so-called Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar fails to follow Article 8(d) of Human Rights Council resolution 5/2 which required the Special Rapporteurs to give representatives of the concerned State the opportunity of commenting on mandate holders’ assessment and of responding to the allegations […]

Read More…